Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Neil Ashton's avatar

Wes normally I am happy to ride shotgun alongside most of your thinking but on this one I feel the need to get off at the next exit. First off I think your premise here is due to a fogged windscreen - as in Subaru being a full on off-road attack wagon (meaning the boulder crawling, high centering variety). A Subie ain't that for sure, but really have never been (some marketing over reach aside). Subaru has built its domestic reputation as a dedicated foul weather chariot and have been a staple of ski and bike towns at least since the 1980's. In that lane, Subaru's are 100% fit for purpose - like getting you out of shits creek in nasty weather and light off road (i.e. gravel roads or fields, not an abandoned mining road in Utah). As to torque vectoring and suspension type your observation might have held 25 years ago but modern AWD with wheel and yaw sensors and computer control are able to apply power to wheels WITH traction as needed. Indep. suspension is just fine - actually better for this use case. As an owner of what is now my 2nd Crosstrek, I find it is a vehicle that performs well in even the worst conditions, and is a lot a value for the buck. Maybe that makes me a little biased but........

FWIW, I first turned a wrench as a professional in 1978, worked my way through college in Gunnison, CO at a 4x4 shop (with a lot of Subaru Outback customers) and only just this year retired after 26 years with a premium auto manufacturer. Got some inkling on the subject.

And still enjoy your work (and subscribe). 😉

BryantP's avatar

I love my Subaru but it’s not an off-road vehicle. It’s strictly for driving on pavement and particularly shines in heavy snow. Subaru makes great vehicles for that purpose. Four-wheel drives don’t do nearly as well on pavement.

12 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?