Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mats Hoefler's avatar

This is exactly why I read your newsletter. You manage to take something that looks like a small policy shift and show the much bigger structure behind it. Most coverage stays on the surface. You connect the incentives and the long term consequences.

Public land debates are also one of those areas where the public conversation is strangely thin compared to the actual scale of what is being decided. The fact that so much land is managed on behalf of everyone yet so few people follow what happens inside those agencies, creates a gap that pieces like this help close.

I also appreciate the format shift you are trying. A regular cadence around specific topics might work really well here because these stories rarely stand alone but mostly accumulate. When someone reads them over time the pattern becomes visible. 🚀☺️

Shelby Schneider's avatar

So incredibly sad …but really good to know what’s happening… thank you for this detailed update. Love hearing overall we are stilllll going to our parks… pretty sure they can’t stop that…. . I mean they could but we’re not going to NOT want to goo..🤔❤️

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?